Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikonites
New Member Introductions
Greetings from the UK (Sheffield/Peak District)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Clovishound" data-source="post: 815510" data-attributes="member: 50197"><p>I should probably leave that to someone who has the Sigma and is using it with a Z camera. There are lots of reviews out there on the Sigma 150-600, the Tamron 150-600, and the Nikon Z 180-600. Keep in mind that there are two different Sigma 150-600 lenses. A contemporary and a sports model. The sports model is supposed to be a better lens and is priced accordingly, just be aware of which review you are reading. </p><p></p><p>Since you have an FTZ already, a used nikon 200-500 F5.6 might be an option as well, if you can get the right deal on it. It is a very well reviewed lens. Ken Rockwell says that if you already have the 200-500, he wouldn't recommend stepping up to the z180-600, although if buying new, he would recommend spending the extra and getting the Z lens. Looking at MPB, the Nikon 200-500 and the Sigma 150-600 are roughly the same price, used, with the Nikon being a little cheaper and lots more of them in stock to choose from. </p><p></p><p>I use an FTZ with my Nikon 200-500. It works well, but I much prefer my native mount lenses. It's a bit of apples to oranges, however, because the z lenses I own are much shorter focal lengths and will naturally focus quicker. Sharpness, with the 200-500, is quite good IMO.</p><p></p><p>I would also recommend to take the long view on lens purchases. While it may make sense to purchase an inexpensive stopgap solution, like the extension tubes for macro, quality lenses will serve you longer than most camera bodies. It also makes little sense to pair a great camera with a mediocre lens. I do understand the desire to outfit your new camera with all the lenses you want RIGHT NOW! Been there. The temptation to jump on a lens or two is strong, and often the wallet won't support what you really want. I had to strongly resist the temptation to pull the trigger on the Z7ii last month when they knocked $700 off normal price, and family was offering a couple hundred dollars of Christmas money to help. I had the money, but couldn't justify spending $2300 on something I just wanted.</p><p></p><p>Since you are looking at possibly getting rid of the D5500 and lenses, you might look at a trade situation with either a local store, or one of the online used equipment dealers. Sometimes you can get a discount versus an outright buy. Of course, you can probably get more for your old system by selling direct to an individual vs a dealer. </p><p></p><p>You'll get there, be patient and choose wisely.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Clovishound, post: 815510, member: 50197"] I should probably leave that to someone who has the Sigma and is using it with a Z camera. There are lots of reviews out there on the Sigma 150-600, the Tamron 150-600, and the Nikon Z 180-600. Keep in mind that there are two different Sigma 150-600 lenses. A contemporary and a sports model. The sports model is supposed to be a better lens and is priced accordingly, just be aware of which review you are reading. Since you have an FTZ already, a used nikon 200-500 F5.6 might be an option as well, if you can get the right deal on it. It is a very well reviewed lens. Ken Rockwell says that if you already have the 200-500, he wouldn't recommend stepping up to the z180-600, although if buying new, he would recommend spending the extra and getting the Z lens. Looking at MPB, the Nikon 200-500 and the Sigma 150-600 are roughly the same price, used, with the Nikon being a little cheaper and lots more of them in stock to choose from. I use an FTZ with my Nikon 200-500. It works well, but I much prefer my native mount lenses. It's a bit of apples to oranges, however, because the z lenses I own are much shorter focal lengths and will naturally focus quicker. Sharpness, with the 200-500, is quite good IMO. I would also recommend to take the long view on lens purchases. While it may make sense to purchase an inexpensive stopgap solution, like the extension tubes for macro, quality lenses will serve you longer than most camera bodies. It also makes little sense to pair a great camera with a mediocre lens. I do understand the desire to outfit your new camera with all the lenses you want RIGHT NOW! Been there. The temptation to jump on a lens or two is strong, and often the wallet won't support what you really want. I had to strongly resist the temptation to pull the trigger on the Z7ii last month when they knocked $700 off normal price, and family was offering a couple hundred dollars of Christmas money to help. I had the money, but couldn't justify spending $2300 on something I just wanted. Since you are looking at possibly getting rid of the D5500 and lenses, you might look at a trade situation with either a local store, or one of the online used equipment dealers. Sometimes you can get a discount versus an outright buy. Of course, you can probably get more for your old system by selling direct to an individual vs a dealer. You'll get there, be patient and choose wisely. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikonites
New Member Introductions
Greetings from the UK (Sheffield/Peak District)
Top