Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Wide-Angle
Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8 vs 18-35mm f3.5-4.5G
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gainzwhey" data-source="post: 814984" data-attributes="member: 51713"><p>I was kind of shocked at how badly this lens performed on DxoMark. I saw the angry photographer also say terrible things about it. But I read other online reviews on DPreview and Kenrockwell and it was mainly good. That's why I thought I might get some opinions here. I certainly can't afford the 14-24mm nor would I because it can use any filters. The 16-35mm is a bit over budget, initially at $500 used. I'm willing to go up to $400.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gainzwhey, post: 814984, member: 51713"] I was kind of shocked at how badly this lens performed on DxoMark. I saw the angry photographer also say terrible things about it. But I read other online reviews on DPreview and Kenrockwell and it was mainly good. That's why I thought I might get some opinions here. I certainly can't afford the 14-24mm nor would I because it can use any filters. The 16-35mm is a bit over budget, initially at $500 used. I'm willing to go up to $400. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Wide-Angle
Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8 vs 18-35mm f3.5-4.5G
Top