I'm going to buy a new lens or two, I like to shoot indoors in low lighting, occasionally outdoors in sunlight, I really dislike flash, I love blurred backgrounds, the blurrier the better, I somewhat understand d.o.f but every lens is different, here are some FX lenses I'm looking at for my...
is a really good quality lens like a fixed 50mm or a 50-140, etc, going to be able to take a picture of that can be enlarged enough to where it would surpass that of a really cheap super telephoto lens like 1300mm?
I've decided to spend a good 1000$ give or take a couple hundred on a nice lens, my top 2 picks so far are the (AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor
105mm f/2.8G IF-ED) and the (AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED) I've started looking at the (AF Nikkor 180mm f/2.8D IF-ED) idk why, I just like lenses...
The (AF Zoom-NIKKOR 70-300mm f/4-5.6G [FX 62mm])
Costs half as much as the (AF-P DX NIKKOR 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3G ED [DX 62mm])
What's the big difference here, it appears (to me) the better overall lens is the 4-5.6, bigger lens, wider aperture, fits FX and DX (if I'm reading correctly), not a...