Just concerned about using it at events with low-light..(Weddings etc..) I know Rick is happy with his..
Nice..Thanks for the advice..Will probably go with Tamron 70mm-200mm 2.8 vc or keep saving for Nikons..God I want to go to Japan...
Actually, Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 VC (USM) is slightly pricier than Nikkor, but I would go for Tamron, which, according to reviews is extremely well built (weather sealed?) and, allegedly, does not suffer from "breathing" as much as Nikkor...
Tamron f/2.8 is $100 more than the Nikon 70-200mm f/4 but $900 less than the Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8.Actually, Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 VC (USM) is slightly pricier than Nikkor, but I would go for Tamron, which, according to reviews is extremely well built (weather sealed?) and, allegedly, does not suffer from "breathing" as much as Nikkor...
Call me blind, but i like the second set color renditions from the D700 a tad better.. The first set looks just a wee bit over sat to me
Not taking anything away from the first set, but you gave something to compare with