Post your Milky Way shots

blackstar

Senior Member
2020-08-11_21-46-35-aurora-kid-s.jpg
 

cascadia

Senior Member
20201104-_DSC1233_resized.jpg

I am really new to this and just beginning to introduce stacking into my work. Tonight is going to be a clear night and I'm planning to play more with stacking and calibration frames now that I have a PC to work from.
 
Last edited:

cascadia

Senior Member
What I came up with last night. Not having any luck with DeepSkyStacker yet, so I did the alignment in PS.
20201106-_DSC1331-Edit.jpg
And a bonus landscape shot:
20201106-_DSC1320.jpg
 

BF Hammer

Senior Member
This one taken shooting in the direction of light pollution. Over the elevation rise on the lower right corner the Sun Prairie Corn Festival is going on with the Sunday night midget car racing right then. It was an experiment for the location, I have a December photo in mind of the Orion segment of the sky rising in the east overlooking the lake that should be frozen and snow covered then. Want to know how much nebula I might be able to pull out of the scene. Milky Way was completely invisible to the naked eye here.

Nikon Z5, Carl Ziess 15mm f/2.8 Distagon, 5-sec sub-exposures, f/2.8, ISO 1600. 23 exposures. Foreground is single separate 25 second exposure. Stacked with Sequator, further refined with RawTherapee and GIMP.

Patrick Marsh EE.jpg
 

blackstar

Senior Member
... Milky Way was completely invisible to the naked eye here.

Nikon Z5, Carl Ziess 15mm f/2.8 Distagon, 5-sec sub-exposures, f/2.8, ISO 1600. 23 exposures. Foreground is single separate 25 second exposure. Stacked with Sequator, further refined with RawTherapee and GIMP.

What is the cause that the MW was completely invisible? light pollution? sky condition? How did you locate the position for the shots?

Your total exposure was about 2'. How do you think of taking 20" or 25" single exposure could accomplish? Appreciate your sharing experience.
 

BF Hammer

Senior Member
What is the cause that the MW was completely invisible? light pollution? sky condition? How did you locate the position for the shots?

Your total exposure was about 2'. How do you think of taking 20" or 25" single exposure could accomplish? Appreciate your sharing experience.

This is a marsh and lake on the edge of my hometown. Viewing over the lake to the east and southeast there is minor light pollution, but south and west is where the city is, so light polluted. The Milky Way on that date at the pre-midnight time frame is almost due south. That is from looking in Stellarium. Google Earth Pro (app, not the website) allows you to enter ground view pretty much anywhere on or off-street, and you can change the skies to any date-time. That can give a decent approximation of where to set up and look. The star constellations help more. Taking high-ISO long exposure test shots pinpoint the Milky Way.

A single 25 second exposure is not enough in this condition. Light pollutions blows out the exposure for starters. The better solution is to increase the exposure time with stacking sub-exposures. Also at 15mm like I shot at, 25 seconds is close to a maximum number as star trails will start to be visible. 15 seconds has been a reliable number in darker skies for me.

I did take 25 second exposures, and I used a single one of those to overlay the foreground part of the image. I can adjust the color balance and brighten it up to taste without affect in the stars that way. And I can stretch the stacked star/Milky Way image to maximize it's visibility in the final product.
 

BF Hammer

Senior Member
Yeah, I know. It's the overall effect of the multi-process I tried.

I presume the Z6 operates the same as my Z5 in that the interval timer feature will not work with manual mode. If you used a remote shutter release (ie: use the Snapbridge app) you could just keep snapping photos every 20 seconds and try to make a series of 80-100 images. With that many photos to use in a astro-stacking program you would have a Milky Way with all the details of the nebulae. And you can still layer a long-exposure on top and mask it for showing the foreground subject only.
 
Top