Don Kuykendall_RIP
RIP :(
Went to the zoo again today. Carried my 55-200 top see how it would do. I think I am going to need to find tune it if I even keep it. I am getting the 70-300 soon so this one will probably get sold.
the 24 megapixel is trying to tell you something .....................................
shhhhhh...................listen .................you can faintly hear it's cry.............."I demand better glass to see the world thru"
That is why I ordered the 70-300 last night. The 18-140 is spot on though. Also I think I will check the fin tune on the 55-200 just to see if that is part of the problem.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
Don it could be just that it requires better handling. 24mp on a DX is A lot for a Dx. Similar to what i have observed between a 12mp vs 36mp.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not sure by what you mean by "Better Handling" but I am shooting a a fast enough shutter speed and in the middle of the range of aperture. Post processing is as it should be. The lens is just not a sharp and the 24mp shows that up more. The 18-140 is razor sharp. I am going to check the back focus on it this week just to see. I know I did have to adjust it on the D7000.
I started laughing... You call that a creek; here in the desert we call that a raging river. ;DYep, Three reasons.
1. It is just down the street from where I live so it is on 5 minutes away.
2. I have shot it enough times to know what it looks like and therefore a good way to judge what I am doing
3. There is no place to walk at my house so when I need to get out and get some exercise there is a nice creek walk downtown so I use it and the zoo for my exercise.
I see, if you are using fast enough SS with good aperture, then the AF would be the next reasonable thing to question.
I don't even take into effect the VR so i always use the reciprocal of the “Focal Length” guideline and usually add a little to that. When I use my 55-200 lens I rarely go before 1/250 sec. I set that as a minimum in the auto ISO setting. On my 18-140 I set it to 1/160 sec. when I get my 70-300 I will probably go to 1/.500 with it since it is so long and that length will really magnify any movement.
That is why I ordered the 70-300 last night. The 18-140 is spot on though. Also I think I will check the fine tune on the 55-200 just to see if that is part of the problem.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
i bet it cant come quick enough
Fourth one down is my favorite. Love the shadow on the inside of the wing. Were theses shot with the 18-140mm?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk[/QUOTE
Thanks and yes all of these were shot with the 18-140. I am getting a 70-300 tomorrow so I should be getting a little longer reach for these shots.
Fourth one down is my favorite. Love the shadow on the inside of the wing. Were theses shot with the 18-140mm?